share

Reports and Publications


Marine Debris
Recycling and Recovery
Environmental Benefits
Resource & Environmental Profile Analyses
Operation Clean Sweep (OCS)
Community Tools

Marine Debris:

America's plastics makers are committed to working on the problem of ocean litter. We support efforts to reduce waste, increase recycling and litter prevention programs, and foster regional and global partnerships.

  • Progress Report – 2014: The Declaration of the Global Plastics Associations for Solutions on Marine Litter
    In March 2011, leaders from plastics associations across the globe signed a declaration to combat marine litter. The Declaration of the Global Plastics Associations for Solutions on Marine Litter (Global Declaration) represented a public commitment by a global industry to tackle a global problem: plastic litter in the marine environment. This Progress Report provides an update on that commitment.

  • Declaration for Solutions on Marine Litter
    As part of their overarching contribution to providing sustainable solutions, representatives of plastics organizations from around the globe have released a “Declaration for Solutions on Marine Litter.” The declaration was announced at the 5th International Marine Debris Conference in Honolulu.

Recycling and Recovery:

This includes a broad range of information focusing on plastic benefits, plastics packaging, material comparison studies, lists of recycled products and their manufacturers, and more!

  • Progress Report – 2014: The Declaration of the Global Plastics Associations for Solutions on Marine Litter
    In March 2011, leaders from plastics associations across the globe signed a declaration to combat marine litter. The Declaration of the Global Plastics Associations for Solutions on Marine Litter (Global Declaration) represented a public commitment by a global industry to tackle a global problem: plastic litter in the marine environment. This Progress Report provides an update on that commitment.

  • 2013 National Post-Consumer Plastics Bottle Recycling Report
    The 2013 edition of the United States National Post-Consumer Plastics Bottle Recycling Report is the 24th annual report on plastic bottle recycling. This study is a cooperative effort between the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) and the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR), the goal of which is to quantify the amount of high density polyethylene (HDPE) and polypropylene (PP) bottles collected for recycling, as well as the rate of recycling of those bottles. This study includes postconsumer recycling values and comments for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) developed by the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) and the Association of Postconsumer Plastic Recyclers (APR). The reclaimer survey portion of the study was conducted by the Moore Recycling Associates, Inc. » 2012 | » 2011 | » 2010 | » 2009» 2008 | » 2007

  • 2012 National Postconsumer Plastic Bag & Film Recycling Report
    The 2012 National Postconsumer Plastic Bag and Film Recycling Report is the eighth annual report on the amount of plastic bags and film recovered in the United States for recycling. Research for this report was conducted by Moore Recycling Associates Inc. for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council.

  • Plastic Recycling Collection: National Reach Study, 2012 Update
    This study determines the types of rigid plastics that are collected—curbside or municipal drop-off—in the United States for recycling and documents the percentage of the population that has access to recycle various types of plastics. The current version of this report was updated to include New York City’s recent recycling expansion. » 2011

  • 2012 Plastic Film and Bag Recycling Collection: National Reach Study
    This study quantifies the percentage of the U.S. population that has access to programs that collect flexible plastic packaging, such as bags, wraps and other film, for recycling.

  • 2013 Growth Trends and New Drivers for Recycling of Non-Bottle Mixed Rigid Plastics
    This report explores major factors that are contributing to the rapid growth in rigid plastics recycling, such as increased demand, public commitments, excess MRF capacity, and improved consumer education. Completed by Resource Recycling, it contains recommendations for communities that are considering adding rigid plastics to their recycling programs, four case studies, and examples of successful community education programs.

  • 2011 Report from Columbia University’s Earth Engineering Center: Energy and Economic Value of Non-recycled Plastics and Municipal Solid Wastes
    Conducted by the Earth Engineering Center (EEC) of Columbia University, this study calculates the energy value of non-recycled plastics that are currently landfilled in the United States using currently available technologies. The study also estimates the energy of diverting non-recycled plastics and all municipal solid waste produced in the United States into modern waste-to-energy facilities. Data is provided for all fifty states.  

  • Latest Report Shows "Dramatic Increase" in Curbside Recycling of Plastic Bags and Film in Los Angeles
    This study commissioned by Los Angeles County Public Works reveals a 39 percent growth in the recycling of plastic bags and film in Los Angeles County between 2007 and 2009.

  • 2011 National Post-Consumer Recycled Plastic Bag and Film Report
    The 2011 National Post-Consumer Recycled Plastic Bag and Film Report is the seventh annual U.S. report on pounds of plastic bags and film recovered for recycling. The report includes data gathered from both domestic and export post-consumer plastic film markets. Research for this report was conducted by Moore Recycling Associates, Inc. of Sonoma, CA for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council. » 2010 | » 2009 | » 2008» 2007» 2006 | » 2005

  • 2012 National Report on Post-Consumer Non-Bottle Rigid Plastic Recycling
    The 2012 National Postconsumer Recycling Report on Non-Bottle Rigid Plastics is the sixth annual report on U.S. pounds of postconsumer non-bottle rigid plastics—packaging and non-packaging—recovered for recycling. Research for this report was conducted by Moore Recycling Associates Inc. of Sonoma, California, for the Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council. » 2011 | » 2010 | » 2009 | » 2008 | » 2007

« back to top

Environmental Benefits:

These publications contain more detailed environmental information, focusing on energy use, recycling, waste impact, source reduction, etc.

« back to top

Resource & Environmental Profile Analyses:

Reports that compare the energy use, environmental emissions and waste impact of plastic and alternative materials.

  • Impact of Plastics Packaging on Life Cycle Energy Consumption & Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States and Canada
    Prepared by Franklin Associates for the American Chemistry Council and the Canadian Plastics Industry Association, this study assessed the energy requirements and greenhouse gas emissions of six general categories of plastic packaging produced and sold in the United States and Canada. These include caps and closures, beverage containers, other rigid containers, carrier bags, stretch/shrink wrap, and other flexible packaging. The assessment found that for the baseline year 2010, replacing all plastic packaging with non-plastic alternatives for these six types of packaging in the United States would: require 4.5 times as much packaging material by weight, increase energy use by 80 percent, and result in 130 percent more global warming potential.

  • Infographic: How Plastics Can Help Enhance a Package’s Environmental Performance
    A visual look how many types of plastic packaging help to reduce packaging weight,energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.  » PDF | » PNG

  • Data Visualization: Common Plastics Packaging Helps Reduce Package Weight, Energy Use and GHG Emissions in U.S.
    A graphic representation of key stats from the study “Impact of Plastics Packaging on Life Cycle Energy Consumption & Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the United States and Canada,” Franklin Associates 2014.  » PDF | » JPG

  • Plastics vs. Steel: Is Automotive Light Weighting A No-Brainer?
    The life cycle performance of polymers in comparison to commonly used steel alloys was assessed in automotive applications. The cradle-to-grave LCA considers a total service life of 150,000 miles for two case studies: A 46 percent lighter plastic bolster on the 2010 Ford Taurus that replaced the 2008 plastic and steel bolster and, a 51 percent lighter plastic running board for the Chevrolet Trailblazer/GMC that replaced the previous steel running board. The life cycle stages included in these critically reviewed and ISO compliant LCA studies address the production of upstream materials and energy, product manufacturing, use, and the end-of-life treatment for all materials used throughout the life cycle.

  • Life Cycle Inventory of Plastic Fabrication Processes: Injection Molding and Thermoforming
    The intent of the study was to develop unit process data sets for two rigid plastic product fabrication methods using primary data from plastic converters. The data quality goal for this study was to use data that most accurately represents current U.S. rigid plastic fabrication processes.

  • Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Inventory of Nine Plastics Resins and Four Polyurethane Precursors
    This newly revised report, “Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Inventory of Nine Plastics Resins and Four Polyurethane Precursors (2011),” provides current data that quantify the total energy requirements, energy sources, atmospheric pollutants, waterborne pollutants, and solid waste resulting from the production of commonly used plastic materials in North America. The plastic resins studied are: High-density polyethylene (HDPE), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), linear low-density polyethylene (LLDPE), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), general-purpose polystyrene (GPPS), high-impact polystyrene (HIPS), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS). The four polyurethane precursors include flexible foam polyurethane (PU) polyether polyols, rigid foam PU polyether polyols, methylene diphenylene diisocyanate (MDI), and toluene diisocyanate (TDI). » report only | » appendices only

  • Life Cycle Inventory of 100% Post-consumer HDPE and PET Recycled Resin from Post-consumer Containers and Packaging
    Sponsored by ACC, APR, NAPCOR and PETRA, this 2011 study by Franklin Associates uses life cycle inventory (LCI) methodology to quantify the energy requirements, solid wastes, and atmospheric and waterborne emissions for the processes required to collect post-consumer PET and HDPE packaging, sort and separate the material, and reprocess it into clean recycled resin.

  • Plastic Packaging Life Cycle Inventory Studies for Coffee, Tuna and Milk Containers
    Plastic packaging is often lighter than packaging made from alternative materials. These three 2008 reports by Franklin Associates quantify the environmental benefits of lighter, or source-reduced, packaging throughout the life cycle of each product in terms of reduced energy use, lower greenhouse gas emissions, and less waste. » coffee study » tuna study | » milk study

  • Life Cycle Inventory of Polystyrene Foam, Bleached Paperboard, and Corrugated Paperboard Foodservice Products
    This peer-reviewed 2006 study from Franklin Associates Ltd. provides an extensive and comparative look at the energy and environmental performance of foodservice packaging products made with polystyrene foam, bleached paperboard or corrugated paperboard.

  • Resource and Environmental Profile Analysis of Polyethylene and Unbleached Paper Grocery Sacks
    The following conclusions were reached regarding the energy and environmental impacts for 10,000 equivalent uses of polyethylene (PE) and paper sacks.

  • Resource and Environmental Profile Analysis of Polyethylene Milk Bottles and Polyethylene-coated Paperboard Milk Cartons
    The purpose of this study is to quantify the energy requirements and environmental emissions of both 128-ounce and 64-ounce high-density polyethylene (HDPE) milk bottles and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) paperboard milk cartons.

« back to top

Operation Clean Sweep (OCS):

The Plastics Division of the American Chemistry Council and the Society of the Plastics Industryy are working together on a revitalized OCS program to strengthen efforts to educate and change behavior in the plastics industry with a goal of zero pellet loss.


« back to top

Community Tools:

Here, the recycling coordinator and industry employee will most likely find valuable information on solid waste management and tools to promote these programs to communities.

Community:

  • Perfecting the Plastics Drop-off
    A practical guide for designing and reducing contamination in a drop-off program.

  • Sorting Plastic Bottles for Recycling 
    This Guide is intended for existing MRF operators, potential new MRF owners and design engineers. Information presented in this Guide can be used to improve the efficiency of sorting and recovering plastic containers collected from the residential and commercial recyclables streams.

  • MRF Model User's Guide 
    You may wish to go a step further in analyzing the operations at your MRF by taking advantage of the Environment and Plastics Industry Council (EPIC) MRF Model, which was used as an analytical tool during preparation of the Guide. The EPIC MRF Model is a MS-Excel 5.0 spreadsheet tool that helps you systematically analyze certain operating and cost parameters at your MRF.


Reclamation:

  • Plastics-to-Oil: Conversion Technology—A Complement to Plastic Recycling
    The benefits presented by plastic to fuel (PTF) technologies are two-fold: transforming nonrecycled plastic into a valuable commodity, and creating a reliable source for alternative energy from an abundant, no-cost feedstock.

  • Demingling the Mix: An Assessment of Commercially Available Automated Sorting Technology
    This study is a census of commercially available sorting technology for plastic containers and plastic flake, pellets and other plastic fractions. The evaluation of commercially available equipment was conducted from November 2009 through February 2010.

  • Plastic Film Recovery Guide
    A complete guide for businesses, governments, and recyclers on how to effectively recover plastic film from the waste stream.

  • Plastics Recycling Cost Optimization
    The report contains detailed discussions and results from implementation and field testing of eleven cost optimization strategies to see if the recommended strategies could actually reduce costs, create jobs and lead to the development of sustainable recycling markets.

  • Stretch Wrap Recycling
    A guide that takes recyclers step-by-step through the design and implementation of a stretch wrap recovery program.


End-Use:


Durables:


Education:


From: 
Email:  
To: 
Email:  
Subject: 
Message: